Archive for CNN

Bill Maher is an IPWSFH*

Posted in Bill Maher, Lamestream Media, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Scumbags of the Earth with tags , , , , , , , on July 13, 2011 by Ferrell Gummitt

Bill Maher Uses Vulgar ‘MILF’ Term to Label Bachmann, Palin on CNN

The Blaze/News Busters

Fresh off of his claim that voting for Republicans is akin to voting “not guilty” in the Casey Anthony trial, Bill Maher appeared on CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight” on Monday, where he slammed and denigrated both Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann.

The comedian used derogatory and sexist language, stating that he hopes Palin jumps into the presidential race so that she and Bachmann can “…split the MILF vote.”

MILF, a filthy acronym, is used to describe attractive mothers and what one might want to do with them (we will stop ourselves there, but if you’re looking for a comprehensive definition, Google the term). The statement came after host Piers Morgan asked Maher, “If you had a choice, gun to your head, which one is it? Palin or Bachmann?” Interestingly, upon hearing the comedian’s offensive response, Morgan simply giggled and moved the interview along.

Of course, Maher wasn’t done there. He went on to insult Palin’s intelligence, choosing Bachmann over the former governor as a more viable presidential option:

But I guess Bachmann, I don’t know. Who could say? Because, at least she’s somebody who can read. You know, she has a job. She was a lawyer. She’s in Congress. She’s not someone who just sits there and reads the prayers on her Blackberry like Sarah Palin. I mean, you know, we’re splitting hairs here. [Emphasis added]

He continues, infusing race into the mix:

 Somewhere along the line they [the GOP] got on a short bus to Crazy Town, and if someone gets the nomination of one of the two major parties, especially in a bad economy with a black president, yeah, [Palin] could become president.

Watch these comments, below:

Maher’s comments come one day after a Washington Post columnist claimed that Palin cannot be taken seriously as a presidential candidate due to the clothing she wears on the current cover of Newsweek. Additionally, last week an aide to Tim Pawlenty said that Bachmann’s “sex appeal” would make her tough to beat in Iowa.

IPWSFH = Idiot Progressive Whom Should F*** Himself

MILF = Mom I would like to F***

I’m thinking Todd could use him more for fishing or trapping bait.

Maher’s offensiveness is the natural Democrat defense. In lack of intelligence fact they can only rely on the personal degradation of others.

 

Limousine Lib Tom Hanks is on board the Obama Express Train to Hell in 2012

Posted in 2012 Elections, Barack Obama, Insanity is a Liberal Disorder, Progressive Tool, Tom Hanks with tags , , , , , , , on June 24, 2011 by Ferrell Gummitt

Forrest Gump will proudly Vote for Obama in 2012

From Politico.com

It’s a bit early, but Tom Hanks has already made up his mind about the 2012 presidential election. He’s voting for Barack Obama, again.

Remember this movie from about 25 years ago it was about throwing money down a Shithole hoping it would come up roses. That is what you man Obama is doing right now with this country,

In an interview with CNN, the actor who’s been on a media blitz promoting a new movie, explained his endorsement.

Host Kyra Phillips introduced the subject, saying: “All right. President Obama, you’ve been a big supporter…”

Interrupting, Hanks said, “And I will be again! Let me take it right now. I’m going to vote for him for his re-election in 2012. I beat to you the punch.”

Phillips pressed the actor for his thoughts on Obama’s “evolving” stance on gay marriage. “Does President Obama need to endorse it?” she asked.

Hanks, a longtime Democrat, went on to say that the president has not only lived up to his expectations but “expanded” them.

Here is where the "Billion Jobs at GM" have hanging out lately. How about you stop on by and ask them how they think Obama is doing.

Said Hanks, “If you would have told me a few years ago that ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ would be repealed and about a billion jobs at General Motors and Chrysler would have been saved because the president was smart enough and strong enough and bold enough to do so, I would have said, ‘Wow. That’s a good president, I think I’ll vote for him again.’

Yet another rich to his ass Progressive-Socialist-Liberal celebrity, telling the uncivilized unwashed masses how to think from the back seat of his limo.

A billion jobs at GM and Chrysler? Really Hanks? I know you’re not a smart man — I get it. But absolving these two car companies of more than $35 billion in debt at the taxpayer’s expense, documented accounting chicanery used to help the companies claim they’ve “paid back” their loans, and the newfound revelation that they eliminated pensions for all NON-UNION employees, is hardly something to be crowing about. Fascism is hardly something to which America should aspire. But I expect as much asininity from someone with an elementary grasp of both macroeconomics and reality.

AND How does one “save a billion jobs at General Motors and Chrysler” when the entire US Economy only has 131 million jobs? It figures that someone who doesn’t know the difference between “million” and “billion” would be an Obama supporter…

Progressive Tool.

Daily Kooks Bring a Great Laugh of the Day

Posted in Andrew Breitbart, Daily Kooks, Insanity is a Liberal Disorder with tags , , , , , , , on June 3, 2011 by Ferrell Gummitt

Someone named Stranded Wind at Daily Clueless claims that “WeinerGate” was put together by the evil right wing journalists to protect Clarence Thomas.

This is just too damn funny.

Thanks Stranded Wind and Daily Kos I needed a good laugh today.

Partial from the post is below.  You can read the whole post here.

From Ace of Spades and Daily Journalism.com

Bringing Breitbart (And Thomas) To Justice (MOAR)

As the situation becomes more clear the need for accountability becomes equally clear.

  Congressman Anthony Weiner was stalked, set up, smeared, and this was coordinated to protect Clarence Thomas from scrutiny.

    This is another ACORN, another Shirley Sherrod, another NPR ‘sting’. They pick a target, they lie and deceive until they have something a credulous corporate media will swallow, and then another career is ruined or another community resource is destroyed.

   Only this time Breitbart’s continuing criminal enterprise has encountered something they did not expect …

   Unlike ACORN, which happened at specific locations, Weinergate was ginned up in cyberspace. Unlike the ACORN employees, used to doing service work for their communities, this event happened where everyone could see it.

You can also buy I Heart Anthony Weiner bumper stickers after you read this “Post”.

I seriously wonder how these morons function in the real world.  Like do they get lost trying to find their own bathroom?  Do they lose things like cars, children, jobs? Do they forget important details like breathing so that we can blame their obvious brain damage on hypoxia?  Eating too much lead paint as a child?  Too much crack on the weekends?

God must really have a special place in his heart for the stupid and mentally infirm. Why else would there be so many of them?

 You can’t fix this kind of willful stupidity. They are like drowning rats in the Sea of Stupid, viciously biting the hands of all who would scoop them out and set them down on the Shores of Sanity. Desperate to be the first one to the bottom.

Yes, Andrew this is just too funny.. But then Daily Kos is a joke to begin with.

Ted Nugent puts Larry King’s Replacement on a Spit and has him for Dinner

Posted in Keith Olbermann, Lamestream Media, Piers Morgan, Ted Nugent with tags , , , , , , , , , on May 24, 2011 by Ferrell Gummitt

Piers Morgan interviewed Ted on 5/19/2011 the result is utter hilarity as to how long Nugent smacks down Morgan.  I ALMOST feel sorry for Piers Morgan – stressing almost.  I wonder if he fired a producer or two after the interview for booking Terrible Ted in the first place.

Or at least brought in a few more viewers than the 5 or 6 he has now.

Piers:  Stick to interviewing the Khadishians, they are little more your speed.

Ted:  Please go on Keith Olbermann’s program on Current TV and rip him to shreds.  I will pay anything to see that.   PLEEEEEASE!!!

Transcript from Free Republic.com:

MORGAN: For a man who is a — who is a patriot, who purports to love his country, that was quite shocking disrespect to your president.

NUGENT: Well, let me put it in official CNN Piers Morgan interview terms, shall I? My limey friend…Anybody that wants to disarm me can drop dead. Anybody that wants to make me unarmed and helpless, people that want to literally create the proven places where more innocents are killed called gun-free zones; we’re going to beat you. We’re going to vote you out of office or suck on my machine gun. You can take it whichever you –

MORGAN: Much as I’d love to suck on your machine gun, the whole point — the whole point of your defense is that a lot of people do drop dead precisely because you are armed to the teeth. And you’d like everybody else to be.

NUGENT: Not true at all. Not true at all.

MORGAN: Eighty people –

NUGENT: Piers, write this down –

MORGAN: You write this down. Eighty people a day die in America from gunshots.

NUGENT: And 75 of them to 78 of them — statistics by the Uniform Crime Report by the FBI and the U.N. study on violent crime — 78 of those 80 are let out of their cages by corrupt judges and prosecutors who know the recidivism is out of control, know that they’ll commit the crimes again, and they let them walk through plea bargaining, early release, and programs.

Kiss my ass. Where you have the most armed citizens in America, you have the lowest violent crime rate. Where you have the worst gun control, you have the highest crime rate.

Piers choose one. Do you want a lot of crime? We have it. Gun-free zones. You want less crime? We have that. More people with concealed weapons permit. Why do you guys resist that statistic?

MORGAN: Well, don’t say you guys.

NUGENT: You guys. Well, unless you’re playing the devil’s advocate.

MORGAN: I can play any advocate I like. It’s my show.

NUGENT: You’re doing a good job. You’re playing the idiot’s advocate here. More guns equals less crime. Period.

MORGAN: Unless I’m wrong — and I don’t want to kiss your ass –

NUGENT: And I’ll be sure to let you know.

MORGAN: — at this point, if you don’t mind. Unless I’m wrong with your argument — well, you’re basically saying that, you know, 90 percent of the gun crime comes from people that –

NUGENT: It’s 96 percent but go ahead.

MORGAN: But they still have to get access to firearms. If you had your way, there would be 10 times as many firearms, right?

NUGENT: Not true at all.

MORGAN: You want everyone in America to own a gun?

NUGENT: Not at all. I’ve never said that. And I got to tell you –

MORGAN: What is your position?

NUGENT: — and I hope you don’t edit this out. Whenever I’ve done interviews with guys that are inclined to be anti-gun, they always go, well, Nugent, you want everyone to have a machine gun. Nugent wants all the deer dead.

MORGAN: What does Nugent want?

NUGENT: Not even close.

MORGAN: What do you want?

NUGENT: What I want is the Second Amendment. We the people, free individuals to have the right to keep and bear arms for self- defense. Find fault with that.

MORGAN: Well, I could find lots of fault with it.

NUGENT: Name one.

MORGAN: Well, the reality is you end up with what happened to Gabby Giffords in Tucson.

NUGENT: That guy had gone through the cracks of the mental health system. That guy had –

MORGAN: How could he be allowed to get a gun?

NUGENT: Because he fell through the cracks, and he didn’t — he didn’t qualify to get a gun.

MORGAN: He fell through the cracks.

NUGENT: The cracks of the mental health system. Everybody knew — all his friends, his family were afraid of this guy, but they didn’t report it. Nobody — nobody reacted to it.

MORGAN: When you see a guy like that get open access to firearms because the Constitution that you subscribe — adhere to so much –

NUGENT: How would you fix that?

MORGAN: Well, I would certainly make it a lot harder for people like him to ever get near a firearm. And that’s my argument with the gun lobbying is that it’s always very, very aggressive. And even as you’ve just exploded with me, it’s always a violent debate. And it’s always like, [Yelling] “I want the right to shoot anyone that comes near me who threatens me!”

It’s always about that. This guy was unstable but was able to go and get a firearm because they are freely available in this country. And that’s where I have a problem with it.

NUGENT: Were you born in England?

MORGAN: I was born in England.

NUGENT: Are you familiar with Ireland?

MORGAN: I am.

NUGENT: Is Molotov cocktails and C4 explosives — those legal in Belfast?

MORGAN: They’re terrorists.

NUGENT: Are those — is that — are those items legal in Belfast?

MORGAN: Well, I don’t live in Belfast.

NUGENT: Well, then I’ll go ahead and educate you. They’re banned in Belfast. They’re forbidden in Belfast. Do you think anybody had a hard time getting them? If you want something — how about in New York City it would take me 15 minutes for me to get a submachine gun in New York City from some paroled crack dealer.

MORGAN: Let me spin the argument. Would you agree drugs then to be freely available?

NUGENT: Not at all.

MORGAN: What’s the difference in the argument?

NUGENT: Because drugs are 100 percent about reducing your level of responsibility, getting high, disconnecting, and I’m a cop. I’ve been a cop for 35 years. I conduct federal raids with the heroes of law enforcement in Texas. In every instance where there is violence, somebody’s high on something, but they’re not always in possession of a firearm. They do it with Buicks and bricks and fire and chainsaws and –

MORGAN: The guy who shot Gabby Giffords wasn’t high. That wasn’t a factor.

NUGENT: No, but he was mentally deranged.

MORGAN: My point about the threat of your argument is you’re saying — there’s a difference isn’t there, between — you’re saying guns should be made freely available, right?

NUGENT: No, no, there should be restrictions.

MORGAN: Because if you — let me ask — let me put something to you. Do you think this is wrong, tell me. They should be made available with some restrictions, but not many, from the gun lobby arguments I’ve read –

NUGENT: Which –

MORGAN: — and then actually the reason is if you made them illegal, they would all be freely available anyway. But with drugs, you say do not make them freely available, make them illegal. Even though you know and I know that drives them underground and probably more people get –

NUGENT: Piers, Piers, I don’t know why you guys either don’t study the information or you just resist it. I think you’re resisting it. In America, where you have more citizens with guns on their person, you have a dramatic reduction in violent crime.

In those areas called gun-free zones, you have a outrageous increase in the loss of innocent lives. That’s the choice. Which one would you make? And in America, legally owned guns are used millions of times a year to save innocent lives. You certainly don’t believe in calling 911 to stop evil in your home, do you?

In case you were interested in the non-gun arguments, here’s a bit of the welfare argument:

MORGAN: My issue about you and the welfare thing is it showed — to me it showed no sense of compassion for people who have genuine problems. Who genuinely need it.

NUGENT: Well, you see –

MORGAN: Your judgment, if you don’t mind me saying, is all encompassing. All sweeping. You think they’re all on the fiddle. [On the fiddle???]

NUGENT: No, I don’t.

MORGAN: They’re all –

NUGENT: No, I don’t. But I don’t think, I know, and the statistics support — once again my sharing with you the statistics, that the abuse, the corruption in that system, is not about helping someone who through no fault of their own fell on hard times, but widespread abuse.

Here’s a bit of the draft-dodger talk:

MORGAN: Well, you’re very — you’re very, very pro the troops. I get that. But you yourself, I mean, you dodged the draft.

NUGENT: No. Now, see, I’m glad we’re here on the Piers Morgan show to set that straight for the 10 million –

(CROSSTALK)

MORGAN: Set the record straight.

NUGENT: No, did I not dodge the draft. I was 17, and I was a clueless idiot, which most 17s qualify. I bet you were –

(CROSSTALK)

MORGAN: I was quite suave.

NUGENT: Being that as it may, no, I was enrolled in Oakland Community College. And I had a one-wide deferment. Did I register — I registered. Did I volunteer? No. Should I have? Yes.

MORGAN: Do you regret that?

NUGENT: You know, I do regret it on one level. On the most important, fundamental level, is that I have a duty to earn these experiments in we the people self-government. And I’ve spent my time and I’ve intentionally put myself in harm’s way going over to Iraq and Afghanistan, right into hell zones of unnamed trenches in Afghanistan danger zones, I do –

MORGAN: Is part of that a guilt thing on your part?

NUGENT: No, not a guilt thing. It was just the right thing to do. At some point, you know, let’s pretend I was a heroin addict when I was 17. Would you bring that up if I’d been clean and sober for 50 years?

MORGAN: Probably, yes.

NUGENT: You’re such a bastard. (LAUGHTER)

Finally, the “homophobia” segment:

MORGAN: Kobe Bryant was fined 100,000 dollars for using a gay slur during a Lakers’ game. And Ted, you wrote a piece after and I’m going to read what you said here. You said that homosexuals are the most protected class of people in America. And you said, and I quote, “The NBA should hold homosexual night during halftime and homosexuals could come down on the court, hold hands, prance around the court to music by The Village People.” You also said that homosexuality was morally wrong.

NUGENT: Do you have a problem with that?

(CROSS TALK)

NUGENT: That’s like Clapton trap. No, let’s put it this way. If you’re gay, have a nice day. I could give a rat’s ass. I don’t –

MORGAN: Are you homophobic?

NUGENT: Not at all, no.

MORGAN: Would you be happy if one of your –

NUGENT: I’m heterophiliac.

MORGAN: What’s a heterophiliac?

NUGENT: It means I’m hopelessly addicted to women — woman.

MORGAN: Right. If one of your children came up and says, Dad, I’m gay. How would you react to that?

NUGENT: I’d say, get the gun, let’s go kill a deer. Inconsequential.

MORGAN: You wouldn’t mind morally?

NUGENT: Not at all. I am repulsed at the concept of man-on-man sex. I think it’s against nature. I think it’s strange as hell. But if that’s what you are, I love you.

MORGAN: But do you believe it’s morally wrong? You have suggested that before.

NUGENT: You know, I’m not going to judge another’s morals.

MORGAN: You judge people all the time.

NUGENT: Yes, sometimes you have to. I have to judge my bass player, and that’s why I’ve got the greatest bass player in the world. No. I say live and let live. Like I said gay? Go nuts. Martians? Cool. I really don’t care.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 377 other followers